I am not a YEC, but I thought this would give a bit of a start to those already convinced one way or another..
Yes. This is not the national Enquirer... it is legit science news.
Worth a comment at least.
Here's the legally permissible 300 word extract ...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor.../dinosaur_to_dc
Scientists Find Soft Tissue in T-Rex Bone
Thu Mar 24, 2:06 PM ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A 70-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex fossil dug out of a hunk of sandstone has yielded soft tissue, including blood vessels and perhaps even whole cells, U.S. researchers reported on Thursday
Paleontologists forced to break the creature's massive thighbone to get it on a helicopter found not a solid piece of fossilized bone, but instead something looking a bit less like a rock.
When they got it into a lab and chemically removed the hard minerals, they found what looked like blood vessels, bone cells and perhaps even blood cells.
"They are transparent, they are flexible," said Mary Higby Schweitzer of North Carolina State University and Montana State University, who conducted the study.
She said the vessels were flexible and in some cases their contents could be squeezed out.
"The microstructures that look like cells are preserved in every way," added Schweitzer, whose findings were published in the journal Science.
"Preservation of this extent, where you still have this flexibility and transparency, has never been seen in a dinosaur before." Feathers, hair and fossilized egg contents yes, but not truly soft tissue.
See link for rest of article
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~