[ Outline ] · Standard · Linear+ Cytochrome C - The Illusion Exposed

[Fred Williams]

The claim:

"[Cytochrome-C] is very unique because it paints an obvious picture of common decent. By examining the differences in the genetic code we can examine how different the species are."


This is a classic case of snake oil, a con where they show you only the data they want you to see. Ironically the snake is the one mosaic you will see in the data below, so it shouldn't be hard to figure out which row is the snake.

Below is a bigger picture of the Cyto-C data that the evos who tout this "evidence" don't want you to see. I've hidden the names of the animals, and instead named them Animal 1, Animal 2, etc. I would like to challenge any evolutionist to step to the plate and describe for us which animals are related by common decent. Good luck!



Note that the evolutionist will be forced to back their claims with real analysis, not gimmicks where you get to pick & choose which animals fit a pre-conceived phylogenic paradigm.

If evolution is true, why do evolutionists need to invoke illusions?

Fred

[PhilC]

Here are the questions that need to be answered:

1. Did that software have a built in bias towards the theory of evolution?

2. If not, what can explain the results that have come out of this?

If the theory of evolution was not assumed by the software then the way that these organisms have been placed into that tree requires an explanation.

Obviously, as it seems like the theory of evolution wasn't assumed, we can use this as evidence for the theory of evolution without being accused of circular reasoning.